LSWWX : Loomis Sayles Global Allocation Fund Class Y

LSWWX is a Allocation Market Total World with MODERATE fees.

LSWWX

Loomis Sayles Global Allocation Fund Class Y

FI Score

60 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

7 /10

Expense Rating

1 /10

Market Score

9 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

9 /10

Similar Funds

We found 633 Allocation Total World funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare LSWWX vs HEOIX

39% FI Score
  • heoix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Hartford Climate Opportunities Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.77% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LSWWX vs PORTX

39% FI Score
  • portx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Trillium ESG Global Equity Fund Retail Class

Expenses: 1.33% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LSWWX vs ATWCX

39% FI Score
  • atwcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

AB Tax-Managed Wealth Appreciation Strategy Class C

Expenses: 1.38% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LSWWX vs EWENX

39% FI Score
  • ewenx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Wells Fargo Intrinsic World Equity Fund - Class Inst

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LSWWX vs AGOCX

39% FI Score
  • agocx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

PGIM Jennison Global Equity Income Fund- Class C

Expenses: 1.85% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LSWWX vs AGGRX

39% FI Score
  • aggrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

American Century Focused Global Growth Fund A Class

Expenses: 1.32% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LSWWX vs QGRCX

39% FI Score
  • qgrcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Invesco Oppenheimer Global Allocation Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.96% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LSWWX vs GLVAX

39% FI Score
  • glvax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Invesco Oppenheimer Global Focus Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.27% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LSWWX vs JOBIX

39% FI Score
  • jobix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

JOHCM Global Income Builder Fund Institutional Shares

Expenses: 0.88% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LSWWX vs GAINX

39% FI Score
  • gainx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Guinness Atkinson Dividend Builder Fund

Expenses: 0.68% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LSWWX vs IMAAX

39% FI Score
  • imaax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Ivy Apollo Multi-Asset Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LSWWX vs FLQD

39% FI Score
  • flqd
  • ETF
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Franklin LibertyQ Global Dividend ETF

Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LSWWX vs FIHD

39% FI Score
  • fihd
  • ETF
  • Allocation
  • Total World

UBS AG FI Enhanced Global High Yield ETN

Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LSWWX vs GLVNX

38% FI Score
  • glvnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Invesco Oppenheimer Global Focus Fund Class R

Expenses: 1.52% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LSWWX vs MWOFX

38% FI Score
  • mwofx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

MFS Global Growth Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.31% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LSWWX vs CSVAX

38% FI Score
  • csvax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Columbia Global Dividend Opportunity Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LSWWX vs IGLGX

38% FI Score
  • iglgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Columbia Select Global Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.31% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LSWWX vs MEVIX

38% FI Score
  • mevix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Lazard Managed Equity Volatility Portfolio Institutional Shares

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LSWWX vs ATECX

38% FI Score
  • atecx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

AB Sustainable Global Thematic Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.01% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LSWWX vs IGEIX

37% FI Score
  • igeix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Voya Global Equity Dividend Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.83% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo