LSWWX : Loomis Sayles Global Allocation Fund Class Y

LSWWX is a Allocation Market Total World with MODERATE fees.

LSWWX

Loomis Sayles Global Allocation Fund Class Y

FI Score

60 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

7 /10

Expense Rating

1 /10

Market Score

9 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

9 /10

Similar Funds

We found 633 Allocation Total World funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare LSWWX vs AWSAX

42% FI Score
  • awsax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Invesco Global Core Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LSWWX vs EDIIX

42% FI Score
  • ediix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Eaton Vance Global Income Builder Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LSWWX vs WRLDX

42% FI Score
  • wrldx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Scharf Global Opportunity Fund Retail Class

Expenses: 0.59% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LSWWX vs NRICX

42% FI Score
  • nricx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Nuveen Real Asset Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.89% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LSWWX vs NLGCX

42% FI Score
  • nlgcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Columbia Global Strategic Equity Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.23% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LSWWX vs ERBAX

42% FI Score
  • erbax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Eaton Vance Richard Bernstein Equity Strategy Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.26% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LSWWX vs MWEBX

42% FI Score
  • mwebx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

MFS Global Equity Fund Class B

Expenses: 1.91% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LSWWX vs HDIVX

42% FI Score
  • hdivx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Janus Henderson Dividend & Income Builder Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.92% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LSWWX vs MSGFX

42% FI Score
  • msgfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Global Franchise Portfolio Class C

Expenses: 1.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LSWWX vs RSGGX

42% FI Score
  • rsggx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Victory RS Global Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LSWWX vs HRLTX

42% FI Score
  • hrltx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Hartford Global Real Asset Fund Class R5

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LSWWX vs AAAAX

42% FI Score
  • aaaax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund - Class A

Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LSWWX vs MWECX

42% FI Score
  • mwecx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

MFS Global Equity Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.91% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LSWWX vs WMMRX

42% FI Score
  • wmmrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Wilmington Real Asset Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.96% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LSWWX vs MFWBX

42% FI Score
  • mfwbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

MFS Global Total Return Fund Class B

Expenses: 1.84% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LSWWX vs MFWCX

42% FI Score
  • mfwcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

MFS Global Total Return Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.84% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LSWWX vs PRDCX

42% FI Score
  • prdcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Principal Diversified Real Asset Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LSWWX vs TEMGX

42% FI Score
  • temgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Templeton Global Smaller Companies Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.33% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LSWWX vs IVINX

41% FI Score
  • ivinx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Ivy Global Growth Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.37% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LSWWX vs GMMAX

41% FI Score
  • gmmax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Aberdeen Dynamic Allocation Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.58% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo