LSFCX : Loomis Sayles Senior Floating Rate and Fixed Income Fund Class C

LSFCX is a Bond Market High Yield Bond with HIGH fees.

LSFCX

Loomis Sayles Senior Floating Rate and Fixed Income Fund Class C

FI Score

30 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

1 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

7 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

7 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,623 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare LSFCX vs NRCFX

16% FI Score
  • nrcfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Real Estate

Natixis Funds Trust IV AEW Global Focused Real Estate Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.93% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare LSFCX vs UGPIX

16% FI Score
  • ugpix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Leveraged Equities

ProFunds UltraChina Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.70% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

Compare LSFCX vs OCSIX

16% FI Score
  • ocsix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

Orchard Small Cap Value Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LSFCX vs OURAX

16% FI Score
  • ourax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Mission-Auour Risk-Managed Global Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.45% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LSFCX vs LFIFX

16% FI Score
  • lfifx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Short

Leader High Quality Low Duration Bond Fund InstitutionalShares

Expenses: 0.74% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternative fund. See why »

Compare LSFCX vs VGEIX

16% FI Score
  • vgeix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Europe Stock

Virtus Vontobel Greater European Opportunities Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Europe Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LSFCX vs MALAX

16% FI Score
  • malax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock

Mirae Asset Asia Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.43% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LSFCX vs OFSCX

16% FI Score
  • ofscx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Value

Olstein Strategic Opportunities Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LSFCX vs AGICX

16% FI Score
  • agicx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

AB Tax-Managed All Market Income Portfolio Class C

Expenses: 1.74% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LSFCX vs AGFCX

16% FI Score
  • agfcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Alger Responsible Investing Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.16% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LSFCX vs ANCIX

16% FI Score
  • ancix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Value

Ancora MicroCap Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.60% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LSFCX vs ANSIX

16% FI Score
  • ansix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Value

Ancora Special Opportunity Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.73% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LSFCX vs AOPCX

16% FI Score
  • aopcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

AllianzGI International Small-Cap Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.04% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LSFCX vs APITX

16% FI Score
  • apitx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Yorktown Growth Fund Class L

Expenses: 2.46% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LSFCX vs APRAX

16% FI Score
  • aprax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

AAM/Phocas Real Estate Fund Class A Shares

Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare LSFCX vs ARTCX

16% FI Score
  • artcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

AllianzGI Multi Asset Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.16% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LSFCX vs ASIDX

16% FI Score
  • asidx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

American Century Multi-Asset Real Return Fund A Class

Expenses: 1.14% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LSFCX vs BRKBX

16% FI Score
  • brkbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

MFS Blended Research Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class B

Expenses: 1.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LSFCX vs MRAEX

16% FI Score
  • mraex
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Meridian Enhanced Equity Fund® A Class

Expenses: 2.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LSFCX vs PFDGX

16% FI Score
  • pfdgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

PFG Global Strategy Fund Class R

Expenses: 2.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo