LSFCX : Loomis Sayles Senior Floating Rate and Fixed Income Fund Class C

LSFCX is a Bond Market High Yield Bond with HIGH fees.

LSFCX

Loomis Sayles Senior Floating Rate and Fixed Income Fund Class C

FI Score

30 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

1 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

7 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

7 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,623 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare LSFCX vs ETW

47% FI Score
  • etw
  • Mutual Fund
  • Other
  • Options-based

Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Global Buy-Write Opportunities Fund

Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Options-based Other fund. See why »

Compare LSFCX vs SUIIX

47% FI Score
  • suiix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

DWS CROCI International Fund - Class Inst

Expenses: 0.89% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LSFCX vs DGLAX

47% FI Score
  • dglax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

BNY Mellon Global Stock Fund - Class A

Expenses: 1.21% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LSFCX vs MAFRX

47% FI Score
  • mafrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Short

Pioneer Multi-Asset Ultrashort Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.59% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternative fund. See why »

Compare LSFCX vs BRWAX

47% FI Score
  • brwax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

MFS Blended Research Growth Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.74% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LSFCX vs PUI

47% FI Score
  • pui
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Utilities

Invesco DWA Utilities Momentum ETF

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Utilities Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare LSFCX vs BIB

47% FI Score
  • bib
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Leveraged Equities

ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Biotechnology

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

Compare LSFCX vs GSPAX

47% FI Score
  • gspax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Goldman Sachs U.S. Equity Dividend and Premium Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.12% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LSFCX vs GSSFX

47% FI Score
  • gssfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Inverse

Gotham Short Strategies Fund Institutional Shares

Expenses: 1.35% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare LSFCX vs PXQSX

47% FI Score
  • pxqsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

Virtus KAR Small-Cap Value Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.01% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LSFCX vs DUGAX

47% FI Score
  • dugax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Delaware U.S. Growth Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.11% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LSFCX vs HWVIX

47% FI Score
  • hwvix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Value

Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Diversified Value Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LSFCX vs XSW

47% FI Score
  • xsw
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF

Expenses: 0.35% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare LSFCX vs MGLAX

47% FI Score
  • mglax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Real Estate

MFS Global Real Estate Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare LSFCX vs MGRBX

47% FI Score
  • mgrbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

MFS International Growth Fund Class B

Expenses: 1.84% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LSFCX vs MGRCX

47% FI Score
  • mgrcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

MFS International Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.84% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LSFCX vs ERBIX

47% FI Score
  • erbix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Eaton Vance Richard Bernstein Equity Strategy Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.01% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LSFCX vs IALAX

47% FI Score
  • ialax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Transamerica Capital Growth Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.18% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LSFCX vs PSOAX

47% FI Score
  • psoax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Value

JPMorgan Small Cap Value Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.24% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LSFCX vs PSQ

47% FI Score
  • psq
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

ProShares Short QQQ

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo