LQD : iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF

LQD is a Bond Market High Yield Bond with LOW fees.

LQD

iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF

FI Score

82 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

10 /10

Expense Rating

9 /10

Market Score

10 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

10 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,623 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare LQD vs UNL

13% FI Score
  • unl
  • ETF
  • Commodities
  • Focused

United States 12 Month Natural Gas Fund, LP

Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Focused Commodities fund. See why »

Compare LQD vs HIPS

13% FI Score
  • hips
  • ETF
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

GraniteShares HIPS US High Income ETF

Expenses: 1.27% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LQD vs OBEMX

13% FI Score
  • obemx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Oberweis Emerging Markets Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LQD vs LVPIX

13% FI Score
  • lvpix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

ProFunds Large Cap Value Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.77% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LQD vs MAEMX

13% FI Score
  • maemx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Victory Trivalent Emerging Markets Small-Cap Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.73% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LQD vs MVEIX

13% FI Score
  • mveix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

Monteagle Select Value Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.36% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LQD vs PDECX

13% FI Score
  • pdecx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

PGIM Jennison Emerging Markets Equity Opportunities Fund- Class C

Expenses: 2.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LQD vs ABLCX

13% FI Score
  • ablcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

AllianzGI Retirement 2030 Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.09% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LQD vs ACVVX

13% FI Score
  • acvvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Neutral

AC Alternatives® Market Neutral Value Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 3.47% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Neutral Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare LQD vs AFAAX

13% FI Score
  • afaax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Yorktown Capital Income Fund Class Institutional

Expenses: 1.47% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LQD vs AGFQX

13% FI Score
  • agfqx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Future

361 Global Managed Futures Strategy Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 2.03% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Future Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare LQD vs APJAX

13% FI Score
  • apjax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock

Aberdeen Asia Pacific (ex-Japan) Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.55% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LQD vs APMAX

13% FI Score
  • apmax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Yorktown Master Allocation Fund Class Institutional

Expenses: 1.37% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LQD vs ARMAX

13% FI Score
  • armax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Energy

AllianzGI Global Natural Resources Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.43% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Energy Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare LQD vs ATVAX

13% FI Score
  • atvax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

Athena Behavioral Tactical Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LQD vs AVSAX

13% FI Score
  • avsax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

AllianzGI Retirement 2040 Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.09% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LQD vs ORLCX

13% FI Score
  • orlcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

North Square Multi Strategy Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.78% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LQD vs LD

13% FI Score
  • ld
  • ETF
  • Commodities
  • Focused

iPath Bloomberg Lead Subindex Total Return(SM) ETN

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Focused Commodities fund. See why »

Compare LQD vs BSMNX

13% FI Score
  • bsmnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

William Blair Small-Mid Cap Value Fund Class N

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LQD vs CANE

13% FI Score
  • cane
  • ETF
  • Commodities
  • Focused

Teucrium Sugar

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Focused Commodities fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs up duo thumbs down duo