Expense Ratio Rating
4 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
2 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
2 /10
$LOGSX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 107 Sector Equity Healthcare funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- ryoax
- Mutual Fund
- Sector Equity
- Healthcare
Rydex Biotechnology Fund Class H
Expenses: 1.71% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »
- suhcx
- Mutual Fund
- Sector Equity
- Healthcare
DWS Health and Wellness Fund - Class C
Expenses: 2.09% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »
- raghx
- Mutual Fund
- Sector Equity
- Healthcare
AllianzGI Health Sciences Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.47% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »
- ryhix
- Mutual Fund
- Sector Equity
- Healthcare
Rydex Health Care Fund Class Investor
Expenses: 1.46% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »
- ahscx
- Mutual Fund
- Sector Equity
- Healthcare
Alger Health Sciences Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.89% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »
- rycfx
- Mutual Fund
- Sector Equity
- Healthcare
Rydex Biotechnology Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.46% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »
- ryhex
- Mutual Fund
- Sector Equity
- Healthcare
Rydex Health Care Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.72% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »
- ryhax
- Mutual Fund
- Sector Equity
- Healthcare
Rydex Health Care Fund Class H
Expenses: 1.73% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »
- lhcax
- Mutual Fund
- Sector Equity
- Healthcare
Lord Abbett Health Care Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.03% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »