Expense Ratio Rating
5 /10
Expense Rating
2 /10
Market Score
6 /10
Category Score
10 /10
Market Size
6 /10
$LMNVX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 668 US Stocks Large Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- dynf
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
BlackRock U.S. Equity Factor Rotation ETF
Expenses: 0.30% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- msxax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
MainStay MacKay S&P 500 Index Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.54% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- frdpx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
Franklin Rising Dividends Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.87% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- dgigx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
BNY Mellon Appreciation Fund, Inc. - Class I
Expenses: 0.65% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- ithtx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
The Hartford Capital Appreciation Fund Class R5
Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- pfpwx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
Parnassus Endeavor Fund Institutional Shares
Expenses: 0.71% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- eusa
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF
Expenses: 0.15% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- prblx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
Parnassus Core Equity Fund - Investor Shares
Expenses: 0.86% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- jlvix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
John Hancock Fundamental Large Cap Core Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.78% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »