LITCX : Columbia Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund Class C

LITCX is a Bond Market Municipal Bond with HIGH fees.

LITCX

Columbia Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund Class C

FI Score

38 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

2 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

6 /10

Category Score

8 /10

Market Size

6 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,623 Bond Municipal Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare LITCX vs ECOLX

17% FI Score
  • ecolx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Riverbridge Eco Leaders® Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.21% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LITCX vs CHUSX

17% FI Score
  • chusx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Alger Global Focus Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.42% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LITCX vs PFSEX

17% FI Score
  • pfsex
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

PFG JP Morgan Tactical Aggressive Strategy Fund Class R

Expenses: 2.03% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LITCX vs PWDCX

17% FI Score
  • pwdcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Power Dividend Index Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.27% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LITCX vs CAXCX

17% FI Score
  • caxcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Catalyst/MAP Global Equity Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.03% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LITCX vs TLGCX

17% FI Score
  • tlgcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Timothy Plan Large/Mid Cap Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.27% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LITCX vs DGSMX

17% FI Score
  • dgsmx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Value

DGHM V2000 SmallCap Value Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.33% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LITCX vs NIOAX

17% FI Score
  • nioax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Neuberger Berman International Small Cap Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.41% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LITCX vs RYDAX

17% FI Score
  • rydax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Rydex Dow Jones Industrial Average® Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.61% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LITCX vs DLMCX

17% FI Score
  • dlmcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

Delaware Mid Cap Value Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.92% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LITCX vs CASAX

17% FI Score
  • casax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Asia/Pacific Stock

Columbia Pacific/Asia Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.52% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Asia/Pacific Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LITCX vs HSIEX

17% FI Score
  • hsiex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Neutral

Hussman Strategic International Fund

Expenses: 2.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Neutral Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare LITCX vs SUPCX

17% FI Score
  • supcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

DWS Multi-Asset Growth Allocation Fund - Class C

Expenses: 1.44% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LITCX vs SAJCX

17% FI Score
  • sajcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Japan Stock

AIG Japan Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.55% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LITCX vs MOM

17% FI Score
  • mom
  • ETF
  • Alternatives
  • Neutral

AGFiQ U.S. Market Neutral Momentum Fund

Expenses: 2.32% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Neutral Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare LITCX vs DROCX

17% FI Score
  • drocx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Diamond Hill Research Opportunities Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.55% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LITCX vs IOCZX

17% FI Score
  • ioczx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

ICON Risk-Managed Balanced Fund Class S

Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LITCX vs AAEMX

17% FI Score
  • aaemx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Alger Emerging Markets Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.53% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LITCX vs AMFQX

17% FI Score
  • amfqx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Future

361 Managed Futures Strategy Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 2.16% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Future Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare LITCX vs GURCX

17% FI Score
  • gurcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

Guggenheim Risk Managed Real Estate Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.65% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo