LIT : Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF

LIT is a Sector Equity Market Basic Materials with MODERATE fees.

LIT

Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF

FI Score

47 /100

Diversification Rating

0 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

6 /10

Expense Rating

3 /10

Market Score

7 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

7 /10

Different Funds

We found 10,815 Sector Equity Basic Materials funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare LIT vs DNSVX

21% FI Score
  • dnsvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Value

Dunham Small Cap Value Fund Class N

Expenses: 1.72% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs VICCX

21% FI Score
  • viccx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

USA Mutuals Vitium Global Fund Class C Shares

Expenses: 2.24% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs EISIX

21% FI Score
  • eisix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Value

Carillon ClariVest International Stock Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs EMTCX

21% FI Score
  • emtcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Transamerica Emerging Markets Debt Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.88% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs EPBIX

21% FI Score
  • epbix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

EuroPac International Bond Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs EPDPX

21% FI Score
  • epdpx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Value

EuroPac International Dividend Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs EPIVX

21% FI Score
  • epivx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Value

EuroPac International Value Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs ESAAX

21% FI Score
  • esaax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Short

Wells Fargo Adjustable Rate Government Fund - Class A

Expenses: 0.74% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternative fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs EUROX

21% FI Score
  • eurox
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Other Region

U.S. Global Investors Emerging Europe Fund

Expenses: 2.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Other Region International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs FMPCX

21% FI Score
  • fmpcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

Nuveen Small Cap Growth Opportunities Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs GCGCX

21% FI Score
  • gcgcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Goldman Sachs Concentrated Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.91% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs WFECX

21% FI Score
  • wfecx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

Wells Fargo Diversified International Fund - Class C

Expenses: 2.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs TWACX

21% FI Score
  • twacx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

American Century Short-Term Government Fund C Class

Expenses: 1.55% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs GRRAX

21% FI Score
  • grrax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Future

James Alpha Macro Portfolio Class A

Expenses: 1.53% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Future Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs HEOZX

21% FI Score
  • heozx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

Highland Long/Short Equity Fund Class Z

Expenses: 2.71% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs HHCAX

21% FI Score
  • hhcax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

Highland Healthcare Opportunities Fund Class A

Expenses: 2.24% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs HULIX

21% FI Score
  • hulix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Huber Capital Equity Income Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.34% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs PINWX

21% FI Score
  • pinwx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

Putnam International Growth Fund Class B

Expenses: 2.12% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs PIOCX

21% FI Score
  • piocx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

Putnam International Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs IGBCX

21% FI Score
  • igbcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Voya Global Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.65% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo