LIT : Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF

LIT is a Sector Equity Market Basic Materials with MODERATE fees.

LIT

Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF

FI Score

47 /100

Diversification Rating

0 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

6 /10

Expense Rating

3 /10

Market Score

7 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

7 /10

Different Funds

We found 10,815 Sector Equity Basic Materials funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare LIT vs GAXCX

41% FI Score
  • gaxcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Goldman Sachs Dynamic Global Equity Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.33% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs TGDIX

41% FI Score
  • tgdix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

TCW Relative Value Large Cap Fund Class Institutional

Expenses: 0.74% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs GMAAX

41% FI Score
  • gmaax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Aberdeen Diversified Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.57% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs HYHG

41% FI Score
  • hyhg
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

ProShares High Yield—Interest Rate Hedged

Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs KDFI

41% FI Score
  • kdfi
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

KFA Dynamic Fixed Income ETF

Expenses: 0.46% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs GSCGX

41% FI Score
  • gscgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Goldman Sachs Capital Growth Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.14% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs GVSAX

41% FI Score
  • gvsax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

AllianzGI Retirement 2025 Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.35% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs HERIX

41% FI Score
  • herix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Hartford Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.09% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs HERYX

41% FI Score
  • heryx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Hartford Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class Y

Expenses: 1.07% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs HFEIX

41% FI Score
  • hfeix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Europe Stock

Janus Henderson European Focus Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.03% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Europe Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs HFHTX

41% FI Score
  • hfhtx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Hartford Floating Rate High Income Fund Class R5

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs HFLAX

41% FI Score
  • hflax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Hartford Floating Rate Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs HFLSX

41% FI Score
  • hflsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Hartford Floating Rate Fund Class R4

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs HOSBX

41% FI Score
  • hosbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Homestead Funds Short-Term Bond Fund

Expenses: 0.79% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs PIN

41% FI Score
  • pin
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • India Stock

Invesco India ETF

Expenses: 0.78% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a India Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs IMLLX

41% FI Score
  • imllx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Transamerica Asset Allocation Moderate Growth Portfolio Class C

Expenses: 1.28% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs IVINX

41% FI Score
  • ivinx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Ivy Global Growth Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.37% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs JGVAX

41% FI Score
  • jgvax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Janus Henderson Global Value Fund Class T

Expenses: 0.87% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs JOGEX

41% FI Score
  • jogex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

JOHCM Global Equity Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.16% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs KAUAX

41% FI Score
  • kauax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Federated Kaufmann Fund Class A Shares

Expenses: 1.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo