LIT : Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF

LIT is a Sector Equity Market Basic Materials with MODERATE fees.

LIT

Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF

FI Score

47 /100

Diversification Rating

0 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

6 /10

Expense Rating

3 /10

Market Score

7 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

7 /10

Different Funds

We found 10,815 Sector Equity Basic Materials funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare LIT vs IUTCX

42% FI Score
  • iutcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Invesco Dividend Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.81% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs JBOIX

42% FI Score
  • jboix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

John Hancock ESG Core Bond Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.63% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs JAHYX

42% FI Score
  • jahyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Janus Henderson High-Yield Fund Class T

Expenses: 0.89% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs CWVIX

42% FI Score
  • cwvix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

Calvert International Equity Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs DIFCX

42% FI Score
  • difcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

MFS Diversified Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.72% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs EVIFX

42% FI Score
  • evifx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Eaton Vance Balanced Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs SCFTX

42% FI Score
  • scftx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Virtus Seix High Grade Municipal Bond Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs ETGLX

42% FI Score
  • etglx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Eventide Gilead Class N

Expenses: 1.39% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs MNBIX

42% FI Score
  • mnbix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extended Term Series Class I

Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs VIXM

42% FI Score
  • vixm
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Volatility

ProShares VIX Mid-Term Futures ETF

Expenses: 0.87% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Volatility Alternative fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs WFDAX

42% FI Score
  • wfdax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Wells Fargo Discovery Fund - Class A

Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs RNDM

42% FI Score
  • rndm
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

First Trust Developed International Equity Select ETF

Expenses: 0.65% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs SPICX

42% FI Score
  • spicx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Invesco S&P 500 Index Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.31% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs OOSAX

42% FI Score
  • oosax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Invesco Oppenheimer Senior Floating Rate Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.11% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs PJFBX

42% FI Score
  • pjfbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

PGIM Jennison Growth Fund- Class B

Expenses: 1.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs JLCAX

42% FI Score
  • jlcax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

JPMorgan U.S. Large Cap Core Plus Fund Class A Shares

Expenses: 1.91% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs PIPCX

42% FI Score
  • pipcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

PIMCO StocksPLUS® International Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) Class C

Expenses: 2.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs FBMCX

42% FI Score
  • fbmcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Franklin Managed Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.69% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs OMGCX

42% FI Score
  • omgcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

JPMorgan Mid Cap Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.73% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs HYSAX

42% FI Score
  • hysax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

PGIM Short Duration High Yield Income Fund- Class A

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo