LIT : Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF

LIT is a Sector Equity Market Basic Materials with MODERATE fees.

LIT

Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF

FI Score

47 /100

Diversification Rating

0 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

6 /10

Expense Rating

3 /10

Market Score

7 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

7 /10

Different Funds

We found 10,815 Sector Equity Basic Materials funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare LIT vs SFNNX

78% FI Score
  • sfnnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Value

Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index Fund

Expenses: 0.25% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs SSBWX

78% FI Score
  • ssbwx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

State Street Target Retirement 2030 Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.04% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs FSAJX

78% FI Score
  • fsajx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Fidelity® SAI Tax-Free Bond Fund

Expenses: 0.25% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs JPIEX

78% FI Score
  • jpiex
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Equity Fund Class L

Expenses: 0.35% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs FCRDX

78% FI Score
  • fcrdx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Fidelity® Conservative Income Municipal Bond Fund

Expenses: 0.35% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs NERYX

78% FI Score
  • neryx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Loomis Sayles Core Plus Bond Fund Class Y

Expenses: 0.48% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs OEF

78% FI Score
  • oef
  • ETF
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

iShares S&P 100 ETF

Expenses: 0.20% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs USHY

78% FI Score
  • ushy
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

iShares Broad USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF

Expenses: 0.15% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs AGTHX

78% FI Score
  • agthx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

American Funds The Growth Fund of America® Class A

Expenses: 0.63% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs AUEIX

78% FI Score
  • aueix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

AQR Large Cap Defensive Style Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.38% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs BAR

78% FI Score
  • bar
  • ETF
  • Commodities
  • Focused

GraniteShares Gold Trust

Expenses: 0.18% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Focused Commodities fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs OMBIX

78% FI Score
  • ombix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

JPMorgan Mortgage-Backed Securities Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.39% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs CMF

78% FI Score
  • cmf
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

iShares California Muni Bond ETF

Expenses: 0.25% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs FLPSX

77% FI Score
  • flpsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

Fidelity® Low-Priced Stock Fund

Expenses: 0.51% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs FREL

77% FI Score
  • frel
  • ETF
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

Fidelity MSCI Real Estate Index ETF

Expenses: 0.08% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs FRLG

77% FI Score
  • frlg
  • ETF
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Large Cap Growth Index-Linked ETN due 2028

Expenses: 0.65% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs FLVEX

77% FI Score
  • flvex
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Fidelity® Large Cap Value Enhanced Index Fund

Expenses: 0.39% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs GSIE

77% FI Score
  • gsie
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF

Expenses: 0.25% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs HAUZ

77% FI Score
  • hauz
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock

Xtrackers International Real Estate ETF

Expenses: 0.10% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs INPFX

77% FI Score
  • inpfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

American Funds Conservative Growth and Income Portfolio Class F-1

Expenses: 0.38% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo