LIT : Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF

LIT is a Sector Equity Market Basic Materials with MODERATE fees.

LIT

Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF

FI Score

47 /100

Diversification Rating

0 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

6 /10

Expense Rating

3 /10

Market Score

7 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

7 /10

Different Funds

We found 10,815 Sector Equity Basic Materials funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare LIT vs EIDO

56% FI Score
  • eido
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Other Region

iShares MSCI Indonesia ETF

Expenses: 0.59% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Other Region International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs EINYX

56% FI Score
  • einyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Eaton Vance New York Municipal Income Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.53% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs EXMAX

56% FI Score
  • exmax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Eaton Vance Short Duration Municipal Opportunities Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.66% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs FALN

56% FI Score
  • faln
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF

Expenses: 0.25% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs FATRX

56% FI Score
  • fatrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Frost Total Return Bond Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 0.73% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs FBAAX

56% FI Score
  • fbaax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

AIG Active Allocation Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.25% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs FDRR

56% FI Score
  • fdrr
  • ETF
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Fidelity Dividend ETF for Rising Rates

Expenses: 0.29% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs FFIJX

56% FI Score
  • ffijx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Fidelity Freedom® Index 2065 Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 0.12% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs FGRAX

56% FI Score
  • fgrax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Franklin Growth Opportunities Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.94% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs FLIN

56% FI Score
  • flin
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • India Stock

Franklin FTSE India ETF

Expenses: 0.19% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a India Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs FMKFX

56% FI Score
  • fmkfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Fidelity® Magellan K6 Fund

Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs FMSTX

56% FI Score
  • fmstx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Federated MDT Large Cap Value Fund Institutional Shares

Expenses: 0.76% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs FRSTX

56% FI Score
  • frstx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Franklin Strategic Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.84% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs FTQGX

56% FI Score
  • ftqgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Fidelity® Focused Stock Fund

Expenses: 0.89% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs FVTKX

56% FI Score
  • fvtkx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Fidelity Freedom® 2060 Fund Class K6

Expenses: 0.49% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs GLTR

56% FI Score
  • gltr
  • ETF
  • Commodities
  • Focused

Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Focused Commodities fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs GTIP

56% FI Score
  • gtip
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

Goldman Sachs Access Inflation Protected USD Bond ETF

Expenses: 0.12% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs GXSAX

56% FI Score
  • gxsax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Goldman Sachs Satellite Strategies Portfolio Class A

Expenses: 0.56% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs HCKRX

56% FI Score
  • hckrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Hartford Checks and Balances Fund Class R3

Expenses: 0.74% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs HFQAX

56% FI Score
  • hfqax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Value

Janus Henderson Global Equity Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.12% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo