Diversification Rating
8 /10
Expense Ratio Rating
7 /10
Expense Rating
4 /10
Market Score
1 /10
Category Score
10 /10
Market Size
1 /10
We found 7,874 US Stocks Large Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
Integrity Mid-North American Resources Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Energy Sector Equity fund. See why »
James Aggressive Allocation Fund
Expenses: 0.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
UBS ETRACS Linked to the Wells Fargo Business Development Company Index ETN
Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Utilities Sector Equity fund. See why »
Invesco International Small Company Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend International Stocks fund. See why »
Lazard International Equity Value Portfolio Open Shares
Expenses: 1.13% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »
Integrity High Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.89% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
American Century International Value Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.34% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »
ALPS/Red Rocks Global Opportunity Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.16% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Pioneer Floating Rate Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.77% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
Putnam Floating Rate Income Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.78% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
Litman Gregory Masters High Income Alternative Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.23% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
Goldman Sachs Technology Opportunities Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »
Barclays ETN+ FI Enhanced Europe 50 ETN Series C
Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Europe Stock International Stocks fund. See why »
Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Emerging Markets Leaders Portfolio Class A
Expenses: 1.55% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »
Janus Henderson Emerging Markets Managed Volatility Fund Class T
Expenses: 1.21% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »
Eaton Vance Government Opportunities Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »
Arrow Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.18% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Future Alternatives fund. See why »
AXS Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class C Shares
Expenses: 2.69% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Future Alternatives fund. See why »
Franklin Strategic Mortgage Portfolio Class C
Expenses: 1.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »
Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.
Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!
Join & Get Your First Course Free© 2025 Adam Fortuna
Site Map