Expense Ratio Rating
9 /10
Expense Rating
7 /10
Market Score
5 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
5 /10
$LEMB Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 1,315 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- jahyx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Janus Henderson High-Yield Fund Class T
Expenses: 0.89% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- eeiix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Local Income Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- lsst
- ETF
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Natixis Loomis Sayles Short Duration Income ETF
Expenses: 0.38% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- bldfx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Blackrock Low Duration Bond Portfolio Investor C3 Shares
Expenses: 1.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- hysax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
PGIM Short Duration High Yield Income Fund- Class A
Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- rinf
- ETF
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF
Expenses: 0.30% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- sdag
- ETF
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
IQ Short Duration Enhanced Core Bond U.S. ETF
Expenses: 0.29% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- pgtox
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
PGIM Global Total Return Fund - Class R2
Expenses: 1.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- ftiax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Federated Short-Term Income Fund Class A Shares
Expenses: 0.96% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »