LCCCX : Columbia Contrarian Core Fund Class C

LCCCX is a US Stocks Market Large Blend with HIGH fees.

LCCCX

Columbia Contrarian Core Fund Class C

FI Score

49 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

1 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

9 /10

Category Score

10 /10

Market Size

9 /10

Different Funds

We found 7,874 US Stocks Large Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare LCCCX vs ABRJX

11% FI Score
  • abrjx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Volatility

ABR Dynamic Short Volatility Fund Investor Shares

Expenses: 2.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Volatility Alternative fund. See why »

Compare LCCCX vs MCEF

10% FI Score
  • mcef
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

First Trust Municipal CEF Income Opportunity ETF

Expenses: 2.59% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare LCCCX vs MKNCX

10% FI Score
  • mkncx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Neutral

Invesco Global Market Neutral Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.24% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Neutral Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare LCCCX vs VHFCX

10% FI Score
  • vhfcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Virtus Herzfeld Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LCCCX vs HLDCX

10% FI Score
  • hldcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Hartford Emerging Markets Local Debt Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare LCCCX vs RYBIX

10% FI Score
  • rybix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Basic Materials

Rydex Basic Materials Fund Class Investor

Expenses: 1.46% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare LCCCX vs RYMZX

10% FI Score
  • rymzx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Future

Guggenheim Series Trust Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.57% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Future Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare LCCCX vs RYCHX

10% FI Score
  • rychx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

Rydex Technology Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.46% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare LCCCX vs RYVIX

10% FI Score
  • ryvix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Energy

Rydex Energy Services Fund Class Investor

Expenses: 1.46% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Energy Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare LCCCX vs TOPTX

10% FI Score
  • toptx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Utilities

Tortoise Energy Evolution Fund A Class

Expenses: 1.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Utilities Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare LCCCX vs NGRAX

10% FI Score
  • ngrax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Real Estate

Neuberger Berman Global Real Estate Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.37% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare LCCCX vs NHSAX

10% FI Score
  • nhsax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Neuberger Berman Short Duration High Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.13% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare LCCCX vs NUXIX

10% FI Score
  • nuxix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Rational NuWave Enhanced Market Opportunity Fund Institutional Shares

Expenses: 1.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LCCCX vs PCREX

10% FI Score
  • pcrex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

Pioneer Real Estate Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.39% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare LCCCX vs MWSTX

10% FI Score
  • mwstx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Metropolitan West Strategic Income Fund Class M

Expenses: 1.84% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare LCCCX vs ACXIX

10% FI Score
  • acxix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Future

Catalyst Multi-Strategy Fund Class I

Expenses: 2.01% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Future Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare LCCCX vs ASDCX

10% FI Score
  • asdcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Short

AAM/HIMCO Short Duration Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.59% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternative fund. See why »

Compare LCCCX vs AWAY

10% FI Score
  • away
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Consumer Cyclicals

ETFMG Travel Tech ETF

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Consumer Cyclicals Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare LCCCX vs HIIIX

10% FI Score
  • hiiix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Catalyst/SMH High Income Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare LCCCX vs PFLWX

10% FI Score
  • pflwx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

RiskPro® Aggressive 30+ Fund Class R

Expenses: 2.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo