Expense Ratio Rating
4 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
9 /10
Category Score
10 /10
Market Size
9 /10
$LCCAX Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 7,874 US Stocks Large Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- lmgix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
QS Defensive Growth Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.25% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- dxge
- ETF
- International Stocks
- Other Region
WisdomTree Germany Hedged Equity Fund
Expenses: 0.48% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Other Region International Stocks fund. See why »
- bausx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
BMO Ultra Short Tax-Free Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.55% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- hwdix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
The Hartford World Bond Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.74% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- gtcgx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Total US Bond Market
Glenmede Fund Core Fixed Income Portfolio
Expenses: 0.53% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »
- exi
- ETF
- Sector Equity
- Industrials
iShares Global Industrials ETF
Expenses: 0.46% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Industrials Sector Equity fund. See why »
- gseu
- ETF
- International Stocks
- Europe Stock
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Europe Equity ETF
Expenses: 0.25% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Europe Stock International Stocks fund. See why »
- fkutx
- Mutual Fund
- Sector Equity
- Utilities
Franklin Utilities Fund Class A1
Expenses: 0.73% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Utilities Sector Equity fund. See why »
- ieih
- ETF
- Sector Equity
- Healthcare
iShares Evolved U.S. Innovative Healthcare ETF
Expenses: 0.18% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »