Expense Ratio Rating
2 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
7 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
7 /10
$LABCX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 1,315 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- egrix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Advantage Fund Class I
Expenses: 1.29% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- jhy
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Nuveen High Income 2020 Target Term Fund
Expenses: 2.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- plflx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Pacific Funds Floating Rate Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.01% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- fct
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
First Trust Senior Floating Rate Income Fund II
Expenses: 2.53% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- dhf
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund
Expenses: 2.77% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- sthtx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Virtus Seix High Income Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.74% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- afrax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Invesco Floating Rate Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- acsqx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
American Century Short Duration Fund A Class
Expenses: 0.84% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- dpltx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
BNY Mellon High Yield Fund - Class A
Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »