LABCX : Loomis Sayles Strategic Alpha Fund Class C

LABCX is a Bond Market High Yield Bond with HIGH fees.

LABCX

Loomis Sayles Strategic Alpha Fund Class C

FI Score

30 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

2 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

7 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

7 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,623 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare LABCX vs HOLBX

12% FI Score
  • holbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Holland Balanced Fund

Expenses: 1.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LABCX vs ICHCX

12% FI Score
  • ichcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Healthcare

ICON Healthcare Fund Class S

Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare LABCX vs MDPIX

12% FI Score
  • mdpix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

ProFunds Mid Cap Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.67% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LABCX vs PZVLX

12% FI Score
  • pzvlx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

Pzena Long/Short Value Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 2.71% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare LABCX vs RYWAX

12% FI Score
  • rywax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

Rydex S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth Fund Class H

Expenses: 1.61% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LABCX vs RYAVX

12% FI Score
  • ryavx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Value

Rydex S&P MidCap 400 Pure Value Fund Class H

Expenses: 1.62% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LABCX vs RYHAX

12% FI Score
  • ryhax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Healthcare

Rydex Health Care Fund Class H

Expenses: 1.73% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare LABCX vs RYMVX

12% FI Score
  • rymvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Value

Rydex S&P MidCap 400 Pure Value Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.62% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LABCX vs RYSAX

12% FI Score
  • rysax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

Rydex Electronics Fund Class H

Expenses: 1.68% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare LABCX vs FRNKX

12% FI Score
  • frnkx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

Frank Value Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.49% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LABCX vs RYISX

12% FI Score
  • ryisx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

Guggenheim Long Short Equity Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare LABCX vs SUFCX

12% FI Score
  • sufcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Guggenheim StylePlus - Mid Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.24% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LABCX vs SVPIX

12% FI Score
  • svpix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Value

ProFunds Small Cap Value Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.74% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LABCX vs GUCAX

12% FI Score
  • gucax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

AllianzGI Ultra Micro Cap Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LABCX vs TVMCX

12% FI Score
  • tvmcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Guggenheim RBP® Large-Cap Market Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LABCX vs JPMNX

12% FI Score
  • jpmnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Neutral

JPMorgan Research Market Neutral Fund Class L

Expenses: 3.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Neutral Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare LABCX vs TWOAX

12% FI Score
  • twoax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Two Oaks Diversified Growth & Income Class A Shares

Expenses: 1.69% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LABCX vs RDMCX

12% FI Score
  • rdmcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Future

Rational/ReSolve Adaptive Asset Allocation Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Future Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare LABCX vs PAGHX

12% FI Score
  • paghx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Permanent Portfolio Aggressive Growth Portfolio Class C

Expenses: 2.23% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LABCX vs ACVHX

12% FI Score
  • acvhx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Neutral

AC Alternatives® Market Neutral Value Fund C Class

Expenses: 4.47% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Neutral Alternatives fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo