LABCX : Loomis Sayles Strategic Alpha Fund Class C

LABCX is a Bond Market High Yield Bond with HIGH fees.

LABCX

Loomis Sayles Strategic Alpha Fund Class C

FI Score

30 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

2 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

7 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

7 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,623 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare LABCX vs ACECX

37% FI Score
  • acecx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

American Century Emerging Markets Fund C Class

Expenses: 2.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LABCX vs ABRTX

37% FI Score
  • abrtx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

ABR Dynamic Blend Equity & Volatility Fund Investor Shares

Expenses: 2.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare LABCX vs LLGLX

37% FI Score
  • llglx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Longleaf Partners Global Fund

Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LABCX vs GDL

37% FI Score
  • gdl
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Neutral

Gabelli Global Deal Fund

Expenses: 5.76% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Neutral Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare LABCX vs VSFAX

37% FI Score
  • vsfax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Value

Federated Clover Small Value Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.26% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LABCX vs MSAUX

37% FI Score
  • msaux
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Asia Opportunity Portfolio Class A

Expenses: 1.37% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LABCX vs QASGX

37% FI Score
  • qasgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

Federated MDT Small Cap Growth Fund Class A Shares

Expenses: 1.39% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LABCX vs PCPAX

37% FI Score
  • pcpax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

PACE Large Co Value Equity Investments Class A

Expenses: 1.44% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LABCX vs HTEC

37% FI Score
  • htec
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Healthcare

Robo Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF

Expenses: 0.68% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare LABCX vs SEF

37% FI Score
  • sef
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

ProShares Short Financials

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare LABCX vs OSCV

37% FI Score
  • oscv
  • ETF
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

Opus Small Cap Value Plus ETF

Expenses: 0.79% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LABCX vs FIUSX

37% FI Score
  • fiusx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

Delaware Opportunity Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LABCX vs MIGIX

37% FI Score
  • migix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Global Advantage Portfolio Class I

Expenses: 1.09% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LABCX vs HSLRX

37% FI Score
  • hslrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

Hartford Small Cap Growth Fund Class R3

Expenses: 1.47% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LABCX vs MIINX

37% FI Score
  • miinx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

BNY Mellon International Fund Class Investor

Expenses: 1.27% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LABCX vs SDVY

37% FI Score
  • sdvy
  • ETF
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

First Trust SMID Cap Rising Dividend Achievers ETF

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LABCX vs EVX

37% FI Score
  • evx
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Industrials

VanEck Vectors Environmental Services ETF

Expenses: 0.55% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Industrials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare LABCX vs CVQTX

37% FI Score
  • cvqtx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Columbia Disciplined Value Fund Class V

Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LABCX vs LZUSX

37% FI Score
  • lzusx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Lazard US Equity Focus Portfolio Institutional Shares

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LABCX vs LFMAX

37% FI Score
  • lfmax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Future

LoCorr Macro Strategies Fund Class A

Expenses: 2.24% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Future Alternatives fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo