Diversification Rating
7 /10
Expense Ratio Rating
8 /10
Expense Rating
6 /10
Market Score
3 /10
Category Score
10 /10
Market Size
3 /10
We found 7,874 US Stocks Large Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
Parametric TABS Short-Term Municipal Bond Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.63% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Equity Asset Allocation Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
Eaton Vance Focused Global Opportunities Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.96% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Putnam Global Technology Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.91% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »
Putnam International Value Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.33% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »
PGIM Jennison Emerging Markets Equity Opportunities Fund- Class Z
Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »
Ashmore Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.42% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »
Federated Municipal Bond Fund Class C Shares
Expenses: 1.58% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.
Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!
Join & Get Your First Course Free© 2024 Adam Fortuna
Site Map