Expense Ratio Rating
6 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
9 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
9 /10
$KGGIX Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 9,859 International Stocks Mid-Cap Value funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- afmcx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
Acuitas US Microcap Fund Institutional Shares
Expenses: 1.70% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- amfqx
- Mutual Fund
- Alternatives
- Future
361 Managed Futures Strategy Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 2.16% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Future Alternatives fund. See why »
- ngvax
- Mutual Fund
- Commodities
- Broad
Nuveen Gresham Diversified Commodity Strategy Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Broad Commodities fund. See why »
- armzx
- Mutual Fund
- Alternative
- Short
Western Asset Ultra-Short Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.78% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Short Alternative fund. See why »
- nqccx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Nuveen NWQ Large Cap Value Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- rydax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Rydex Dow Jones Industrial Average® Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.61% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- pass
- ETF
- Alternative
- Inverse
Direxion Daily Cnsmr Discret Bear 3XShrs
Expenses: 1.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »
- pudcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
PGIM Real Assets Fund- Class C
Expenses: 1.56% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- pwdcx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Power Dividend Index Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.27% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »