Expense Ratio Rating
5 /10
Expense Rating
1 /10
Market Score
8 /10
Category Score
10 /10
Market Size
8 /10
$JSEAX Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 9,369 International Stocks Large Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- tyo
- ETF
- Alternative
- Inverse
Direxion Daily 7-10 Year Treasury Bear 3X Shares
Expenses: 1.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »
- iecax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Ivy Pictet Emerging Markets Local Currency Debt Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.21% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- hrmdx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Value
Heartland Mid Cap Value Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- usmcx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
AlphaSimplex Tactical U.S. Market Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- wftcx
- Mutual Fund
- Sector Equity
- Technology
Wells Fargo Specialized Technology Fund - Class C
Expenses: 2.13% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »
- sihsx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Guggenheim High Yield Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- htaax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Highland Total Return Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- tpdix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Timothy Plan Defensive Strategies Fund Class I
Expenses: 1.16% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- tmnix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Counterpoint Tactical Municipal Fund Class I
Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- pxczx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Virtus Newfleet Tax-Exempt Bond Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.60% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- tbacx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Touchstone Dynamic Diversified Income Fund C
Expenses: 1.24% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- bxfcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Barings Global Floating Rate Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.74% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- icgex
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Voya Global Equity Dividend Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.81% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- uxpix
- Mutual Fund
- Alternatives
- Inverse
ProFunds UltraShort International Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.78% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternatives fund. See why »
- tvmax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Guggenheim RBP® Large-Cap Market Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- wsmix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Blend
William Blair Small-Mid Cap Value Fund Class I
Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- rylgx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.61% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- tveax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Guggenheim RBP® Dividend Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- ryizx
- Mutual Fund
- Alternative
- Inverse
Rydex Inverse Russell 2000 2x Strategy Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.63% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »