Expense Ratio Rating
8 /10
Expense Rating
8 /10
Market Score
9 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
9 /10
We found 9,682 Allocation Target-Date funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
Rydex Inverse Mid-Cap Strategy Fund Class H
Expenses: 1.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternatives fund. See why »
Virtus Seix Corporate Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
Putnam Focused Equity Fund Class B
Expenses: 2.03% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
Putnam Focused Equity Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.03% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
Putnam International Value Fund Class B
Expenses: 2.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »
Thrivent Multidimensional Income Fund Class S
Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »
Neuberger Berman Dividend Growth Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
PGIM California Muni Income Fund-Class C
Expenses: 1.72% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
PGIM Short Duration Muni Fund- Class C
Expenses: 1.60% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
Putnam International Value Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »
Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.
Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!
Join & Get Your First Course Free© 2024 Adam Fortuna
Site Map