JLFAX : John Hancock Funds II Multimanager 2030 Lifetime Portfolio Class A

JLFAX is a Allocation Market Target-Date with HIGH fees.

JLFAX

John Hancock Funds II Multimanager 2030 Lifetime Portfolio Class A

FI Score

58 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

5 /10

Expense Rating

6 /10

Market Score

7 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

7 /10

Different Funds

We found 9,682 Allocation Target-Date funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare JLFAX vs NTHEX

21% FI Score
  • nthex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Northeast Investors Trust

Expenses: 1.56% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare JLFAX vs RYRUX

21% FI Score
  • ryrux
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Leveraged Equities

Rydex Russell 2000 2x Strategy Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.85% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

Compare JLFAX vs IEGCX

21% FI Score
  • iegcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

Invesco International Small Company Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare JLFAX vs IEVOX

21% FI Score
  • ievox
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Value

Lazard International Equity Value Portfolio Open Shares

Expenses: 1.13% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare JLFAX vs NBNCX

21% FI Score
  • nbncx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

Neuberger Berman International Select Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.91% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare JLFAX vs SCCUX

21% FI Score
  • sccux
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Invesco Low Volatility Equity Yield Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.93% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare JLFAX vs JSVTX

21% FI Score
  • jsvtx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

Janus Henderson Small-Mid Cap Value Fund Class T

Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare JLFAX vs SAOCX

21% FI Score
  • saocx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

Guggenheim Alpha Opportunity Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.48% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare JLFAX vs IHFAX

21% FI Score
  • ihfax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Integrity High Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.89% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare JLFAX vs INSIX

21% FI Score
  • insix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Catalyst Insider Buying Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.27% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare JLFAX vs TSFAX

21% FI Score
  • tsfax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

Touchstone Small Cap Class A

Expenses: 1.39% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare JLFAX vs SVTIX

21% FI Score
  • svtix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Symons Value Institutional Fund Class II

Expenses: 1.06% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare JLFAX vs GITCX

21% FI Score
  • gitcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

Goldman Sachs Technology Opportunities Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare JLFAX vs GIUIX

21% FI Score
  • giuix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Guggenheim StylePlus - Mid Growth Fund Institutional

Expenses: 1.28% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare JLFAX vs FFEU

21% FI Score
  • ffeu
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Europe Stock

Barclays ETN+ FI Enhanced Europe 50 ETN Series C

Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Europe Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare JLFAX vs ECGOX

21% FI Score
  • ecgox
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

Eaton Vance Government Opportunities Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare JLFAX vs TGRCX

21% FI Score
  • tgrcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock

Invesco Pacific Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.28% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare JLFAX vs JLGAX

21% FI Score
  • jlgax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

JAG Large Cap Growth Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare JLFAX vs TIOAX

21% FI Score
  • tioax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

Transamerica Inflation Opportunities Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare JLFAX vs NEFHX

21% FI Score
  • nefhx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Loomis Sayles High Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.03% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo