JHMS : John Hancock Multifactor Consumer Staples ETF

JHMS is a Sector Equity Market Consumer Defensive with MODERATE fees.

JHMS

John Hancock Multifactor Consumer Staples ETF

FI Score

48 /100

Diversification Rating

9 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

7 /10

Expense Rating

6 /10

Market Score

2 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

2 /10

Different Funds

We found 10,815 Sector Equity Consumer Defensive funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare JHMS vs DNIOX

11% FI Score
  • dniox
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Dunham International Opportunity Bond Fund Class N

Expenses: 1.36% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare JHMS vs DWATX

11% FI Score
  • dwatx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Arrow DWA Balanced Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.47% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare JHMS vs PCYAX

11% FI Score
  • pcyax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Commodities
  • Broad

PCS Commodity Strategy Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Broad Commodities fund. See why »

Compare JHMS vs ECSEX

11% FI Score
  • ecsex
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Eaton Vance Special Equities Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.04% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare JHMS vs ECHCX

11% FI Score
  • echcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Future

AXS Chesapeake Strategy Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.85% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Future Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare JHMS vs RYIYX

11% FI Score
  • ryiyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

Rydex Inverse High Yield Strategy Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare JHMS vs RYROX

11% FI Score
  • ryrox
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

Rydex Russell 2000 Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.46% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare JHMS vs EMCAX

11% FI Score
  • emcax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

Empiric 2500 Fund Class A

Expenses: 2.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare JHMS vs PFACX

11% FI Score
  • pfacx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

Pacific Funds Small-Cap Class C

Expenses: 1.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare JHMS vs TRIFX

11% FI Score
  • trifx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Catalyst/SMH Total Return Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.57% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2024   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo