Expense Ratio Rating
7 /10
Expense Rating
1 /10
Market Score
4 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
4 /10
$JGVAX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 633 Allocation Total World funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- gaxcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Goldman Sachs Dynamic Global Equity Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.33% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- aset
- ETF
- Allocation
- Total World
FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund
Expenses: 0.57% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- goat
- ETF
- Allocation
- Total World
VanEck Vectors Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF
Expenses: 0.56% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- jogex
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
JOHCM Global Equity Fund Class I
Expenses: 1.16% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- pidcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Pioneer Solutions - Balanced Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.19% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- jvgix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Janus Henderson Adaptive Global Allocation Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.77% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- eadix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Global Dividend Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- bdhcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
BlackRock Dynamic High Income Portfolio Investor C
Expenses: 1.65% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- wgfix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
William Blair Global Leaders Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »