Expense Ratio Rating
0 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
10 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
10 /10
$JFR Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 1,315 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- meaix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Emerging Markets Fixed Income Opportunities Portfolio I
Expenses: 0.83% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- fhycx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Federated High Yield Trust Class C
Expenses: 1.78% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- fcnbx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Templeton International Bond Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.38% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- ifrcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Voya Floating Rate Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- ddfax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Delaware Floating Rate Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.94% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- bxgyx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Barings Global High Yield Fund Class Y
Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- pggix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Putnam Global Income Trust Class A
Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- adpcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
AB Short Duration Portfolio Class C
Expenses: 1.18% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- fldkx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Delaware Limited Duration Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »