Expense Ratio Rating
7 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
6 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
6 /10
$JERIX Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 10,678 Sector Equity Real Estate funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- sbacx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Touchstone Balanced Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.78% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- seqpx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Guggenheim World Equity Income Fund Class P
Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- sghcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
DWS Global High Income Fund - Class C
Expenses: 1.71% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- shxpx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
American Beacon Shapiro Equity Opportunities Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.17% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- spwcx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Growth
American Beacon Stephens Small Cap Growth Fund C Class
Expenses: 2.14% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- ssctx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Growth
Virtus Silvant Small-Cap Growth Stock Fund Class I
Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- suvcx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
PGIM QMA Large-Cap Value Fund- Class C
Expenses: 2.13% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- tplix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Timothy Plan Large/Mid Cap Growth Fund Class I
Expenses: 1.27% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- uwpix
- Mutual Fund
- Alternatives
- Inverse
ProFunds UltraShort Dow 30 Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.78% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternatives fund. See why »
- vnscx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
Natixis Vaughan Nelson Select Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.91% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- wagtx
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Mid-Cap Growth
Seven Canyons World Innovators Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth International Stocks fund. See why »
- wbrrx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
William Blair Income Fund Class N
Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- weccx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Wells Fargo Endeavor Select Fund - Class C
Expenses: 1.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- wfmax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Wells Fargo Moderate Balanced Fund - Class A
Expenses: 1.12% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- wmkmx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
WesMark West Virginia Municipal Bond Fund
Expenses: 1.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- wmksx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Growth
WesMark Small Company Growth Fund
Expenses: 1.26% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- jecax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
JPMorgan Emerging Markets Strategic Debt Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- bjbhx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Aberdeen Global High Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- caxax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Catalyst/MAP Global Equity Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.28% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »