Expense Ratio Rating
0 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
10 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
10 /10
$JEMD Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 1,315 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- deecx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Delaware Extended Duration Bond Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.57% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- gifcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Guggenheim Floating Rate Strategies Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.82% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- scfcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Shenkman Capital Short Duration High Income Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.70% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- sihpx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Guggenheim High Yield Fund Class P
Expenses: 1.28% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- bxfax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Barings Global Floating Rate Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- rebax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Columbia Emerging Markets Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.11% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- wfshx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Wells Fargo Short-Term Bond Fund - Class C
Expenses: 1.47% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- cpitx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Counterpoint Tactical Income Fund Class I
Expenses: 1.54% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- atmax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
PIMCO Strategic Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.92% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »