Expense Ratio Rating
2 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
2 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
2 /10
$IZSCX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 633 Allocation Total World funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- ahtpx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
American Beacon AHL TargetRisk Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.42% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- tesgx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Templeton Global Smaller Companies Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- aggcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Invesco Global Growth Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- nqgax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Nuveen NWQ Global Equity Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.11% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- hrlsx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Hartford Global Real Asset Fund Class R4
Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- msdlx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund Trust Global Strategist Portfolio Class L
Expenses: 1.53% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- erbcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Eaton Vance Richard Bernstein Equity Strategy Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.01% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- jvgtx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Janus Henderson Adaptive Global Allocation Fund Class T
Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- seefx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Saturna Sustainable Equity Fund
Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »