• spxe
• ETF
• US Stocks
• Large Blend

ProShares S&P 500 ex-Energy ETF

Expenses: 0.27% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

• jrsix
• Mutual Fund
• US Stocks
• Large Blend

Janus Henderson U.S. Managed Volatility Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

• rbus
• ETF
• US Stocks
• Large Blend

Nationwide Risk-Based U.S. Equity ETF

Expenses: 0.30% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

• oaylx
• Mutual Fund
• US Stocks
• Large Blend

Oakmark Select Fund Class Advisor

Expenses: 0.86% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

• mxdu
• ETF
• US Stocks
• Large Blend

Nationwide Maximum Diversification U.S. Core Equity ETF

Expenses: 0.34% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

• crf
• Mutual Fund
• US Stocks
• Large Blend

Cornerstone Total Return Fund Inc

Expenses: 1.17% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

• afdix
• Mutual Fund
• US Stocks
• Large Blend

American Century Sustainable Equity Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

• ftcs
• ETF
• US Stocks
• Large Blend

First Trust Capital Strength ETF

Expenses: 0.58% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

• pfprx
• Mutual Fund
• US Stocks
• Large Blend

Parnassus Mid Cap Growth Fund - Institutional

Expenses: 0.68% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

• qcenx
• Mutual Fund
• US Stocks
• Large Blend

AQR Large Cap Multi-Style Fund Class N

Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

• fex
• ETF
• US Stocks
• Large Blend

First Trust Large Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

• eqwl
• ETF
• US Stocks
• Large Blend

Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF

Expenses: 0.25% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

• bspzx
• Mutual Fund
• US Stocks
• Large Blend

iShares S&P 500 Index Fund Investor C1 Shares

Expenses: 1.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

• lvus
• ETF
• US Stocks
• Large Blend

Hartford Multifactor Low Volatility US Equity ETF

Expenses: 0.19% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

• shapx
• Mutual Fund
• US Stocks
• Large Blend

ClearBridge Appreciation Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

• tmlcx
• Mutual Fund
• US Stocks
• Large Blend

SEI Institutional Managed Trust Tax-Managed Large Cap Fund Class F

Expenses: 0.89% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

• nwaex
• Mutual Fund
• US Stocks
• Large Blend

Nationwide Mellon Dynamic U.S. Core Fund Eagle Class

Expenses: 0.76% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

• cfimx
• Mutual Fund
• US Stocks
• Large Blend

Clipper Fund

Expenses: 0.71% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

• esg
• ETF
• US Stocks
• Large Blend

FlexShares STOXX US ESG Impact Index Fund

Expenses: 0.32% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

• lccax
• Mutual Fund
• US Stocks
• Large Blend

Columbia Contrarian Core Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.03% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »