Diversification Rating
2 /10
Expense Ratio Rating
8 /10
Expense Rating
4 /10
Market Score
7 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
7 /10
$IWC Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 310 US Stocks Small Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- pbsm
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA Small Cap ETF
Expenses: 0.06% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- dccax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
Delaware Small Cap Core Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- csvix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
Calvert Small-Cap Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- sigwx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
Touchstone Small Company Fund Class Y
Expenses: 0.87% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- mmsix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
Praxis Small Cap Index Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- qsmlx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
AQR Small Cap Multi-Style Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.64% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- dgrs
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Fund
Expenses: 0.38% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- fthnx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Small-Cap Equity Fund Investor Shares
Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- ees
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Earnings Fund
Expenses: 0.38% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »