Expense Ratio Rating
10 /10
Expense Rating
8 /10
Market Score
7 /10
Category Score
8 /10
Market Size
7 /10
$ITM Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 746 Bond Municipal Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- gimax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Columbia Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund Class V
Expenses: 0.71% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- bsmp
- ETF
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Invesco BulletShares (R) 2025 Municipal Bond ETF
Expenses: 0.18% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- fumb
- ETF
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
First Trust Ultra Short Duration Municipal ETF
Expenses: 0.35% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- atoax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Aberdeen Ultra Short Municipal Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- intax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Columbia Strategic Municipal Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.81% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- bbinx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
BBH Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund Class N
Expenses: 0.65% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- drtax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
BNY Mellon Municipal Bond Fund
Expenses: 0.73% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- fmuux
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Federated Municipal Ultrashort Fund Class A Shares
Expenses: 0.81% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- rmunx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Invesco Oppenheimer Rochester New York Municipals Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.92% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »