Expense Ratio Rating
3 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
4 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
4 /10
$IREAX Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 10,678 Sector Equity Real Estate funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- afnix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
AAM/Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.83% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- paclx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund Advisor Class
Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- mafox
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
BlackRock Large Cap Focus Growth Fund Institutional Shares
Expenses: 0.83% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- magcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
BlackRock Advantage Global Fund, Inc.Institutional Shares
Expenses: 0.72% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- mgoix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Total US Bond Market
MainStay MacKay Infrastructure Bond Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »
- mdnkx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
BlackRock New York Municipal Opportunities Fund Investor A1 Shares
Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- pblax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Principal Blue Chip Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- opgix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Invesco Oppenheimer Global Opportunities Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.09% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- ncatx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Northern California Tax-Exempt Fund
Expenses: 0.46% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- aagpx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
American Beacon Large Cap Value Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 0.96% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- apdrx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Artisan Global Opportunities Fund Advisor Class
Expenses: 1.01% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- otcax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Growth
MFS Mid Cap Growth Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.09% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- osmax
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Mid-Cap Growth
Invesco Oppenheimer International Small-Mid Company Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.31% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Mid-Cap Growth International Stocks fund. See why »
- bdhax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
BlackRock Dynamic High Income Portfolio Investor A
Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- bilpx
- Mutual Fund
- Alternatives
- Neutral
BlackRock Event Driven Equity Fund Institutional Shares
Expenses: 1.28% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Neutral Alternatives fund. See why »
- bsgpx
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Large Growth
Baillie Gifford Developed EAFE All Cap Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.73% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »
- bsml
- ETF
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Invesco BulletShares (R) 2021 Municipal Bond ETF
Expenses: 0.18% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- bsmm
- ETF
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Invesco BulletShares (R) 2022 Municipal Bond ETF
Expenses: 0.18% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »