Diversification Rating
0 /10
Expense Ratio Rating
1 /10
Expense Rating
3 /10
Market Score
8 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
8 /10
$IPAY Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 9,674 Allocation Other funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- qcenx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
AQR Large Cap Multi-Style Fund Class N
Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- sfvyx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
ClearBridge All Cap Value Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.77% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- sbsyx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Western Asset Short-Term Bond Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- vgiix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
JPMorgan Growth And Income Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.68% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- wbfix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Total US Bond Market
William Blair Bond Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »
- vsmv
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Large Value
VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF
Expenses: 0.35% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- qgro
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
American Century U.S. Quality Growth ETF
Expenses: 0.29% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- ppilx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
DWS Short Duration Fund - Class Inst
Expenses: 0.54% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- pplt
- ETF
- Commodities
- Focused
Aberdeen Standard Physical Platinum Shares ETF
Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Focused Commodities fund. See why »