IPAC : iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF

IPAC is a International Stocks Market Asia/Pacific Stock with LOW fees.

IPAC

iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF

FI Score

63 /100

Diversification Rating

4 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

8 /10

Expense Rating

9 /10

Market Score

5 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

5 /10

Different Funds

We found 10,038 International Stocks Asia/Pacific Stock funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare IPAC vs ARWCX

35% FI Score
  • arwcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

American Century Investments One Choice 2025 Portfolio C Class

Expenses: 1.76% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare IPAC vs EKWDX

35% FI Score
  • ekwdx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Basic Materials

Wells Fargo Precious Metals Fund - Class Admin

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare IPAC vs JMCCX

35% FI Score
  • jmccx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

JPMorgan Mid Cap Equity Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.63% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare IPAC vs ARRFX

35% FI Score
  • arrfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

AMG River Road Focused Absolute Value Fund Class N

Expenses: 0.98% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare IPAC vs ARKQ

35% FI Score
  • arkq
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare IPAC vs ARGNX

35% FI Score
  • argnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

American Century Investments One Choice 2060 Portfolio I Class

Expenses: 0.68% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare IPAC vs ARDMX

35% FI Score
  • ardmx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

American Century Investments One Choice 2040 Portfolio A Class

Expenses: 1.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare IPAC vs KCGIX

35% FI Score
  • kcgix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Knights of Columbus Large Cap Growth Fund I Class

Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare IPAC vs ARANX

35% FI Score
  • aranx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Horizon Active Risk Assist® Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.24% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare IPAC vs QCLVX

35% FI Score
  • qclvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Federated MDT Large Cap Value Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.77% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare IPAC vs ECGMX

35% FI Score
  • ecgmx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.76% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare IPAC vs ECLTX

35% FI Score
  • ecltx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Parametric TABS 5-to-15 Year Laddered Municipal Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare IPAC vs ANHIX

35% FI Score
  • anhix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Angel Oak High Yield Opportunities Fund Class Institutional

Expenses: 0.65% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare IPAC vs GDMIX

35% FI Score
  • gdmix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Lazard Global Dynamic Multi-Asset Portfolio Institutional Shares

Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare IPAC vs AMHYX

35% FI Score
  • amhyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Invesco High Yield Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.01% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare IPAC vs ADOIX

35% FI Score
  • adoix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

ACM Dynamic Opportunity Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare IPAC vs DSL

35% FI Score
  • dsl
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

DoubleLine Income Solutions Fund

Expenses: 3.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare IPAC vs GSLAX

35% FI Score
  • gslax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Goldman Sachs Large Cap Value Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.11% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare IPAC vs LMMDX

35% FI Score
  • lmmdx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

1919 Maryland Tax-Free Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare IPAC vs WBSIX

35% FI Score
  • wbsix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

William Blair Small Cap Growth Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo