IPAC : iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF

IPAC is a International Stocks Market Asia/Pacific Stock with LOW fees.

IPAC

iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF

FI Score

63 /100

Diversification Rating

4 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

8 /10

Expense Rating

9 /10

Market Score

5 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

5 /10

Different Funds

We found 10,038 International Stocks Asia/Pacific Stock funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare IPAC vs DGP

37% FI Score
  • dgp
  • ETF
  • Commodities
  • Focused

DB Gold Double Long ETN

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Focused Commodities fund. See why »

Compare IPAC vs PKB

37% FI Score
  • pkb
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Consumer Cyclicals

Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Consumer Cyclicals Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare IPAC vs EVSTX

37% FI Score
  • evstx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Wells Fargo Disciplined U.S. Core Fund - Class C

Expenses: 1.59% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare IPAC vs NBHCX

37% FI Score
  • nbhcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Neuberger Berman Equity Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.81% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare IPAC vs JRO

37% FI Score
  • jro
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Nuveen Floating Rate Income Opportunity Fund

Expenses: 3.31% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare IPAC vs EGRYX

37% FI Score
  • egryx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

Wells Fargo Fundamental Small Cap Growth Fund - Class Inst

Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare IPAC vs CTFDX

37% FI Score
  • ctfdx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Columbia Thermostat Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare IPAC vs MZHIX

37% FI Score
  • mzhix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Muzinich U.S. High Yield Corporate Bond Fund Institutional Shares

Expenses: 0.59% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare IPAC vs SDVY

37% FI Score
  • sdvy
  • ETF
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

First Trust SMID Cap Rising Dividend Achievers ETF

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare IPAC vs JQC

37% FI Score
  • jqc
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Nuveen Credit Strategies Income Fund

Expenses: 3.42% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare IPAC vs KIO

37% FI Score
  • kio
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

KKR Income Opportunities Fund

Expenses: 3.38% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare IPAC vs PTEBX

37% FI Score
  • ptebx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

BNY Mellon Opportunistic Municipal Securities Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.86% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare IPAC vs HYLS

37% FI Score
  • hyls
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

First Trust Tactical High Yield ETF

Expenses: 1.23% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare IPAC vs AFSM

37% FI Score
  • afsm
  • ETF
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

First Trust Active Factor Small Cap ETF

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare IPAC vs ACP

37% FI Score
  • acp
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Aberdeen Income Credit Strategies Fund

Expenses: 3.89% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare IPAC vs LFMAX

37% FI Score
  • lfmax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Future

LoCorr Macro Strategies Fund Class A

Expenses: 2.24% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Future Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare IPAC vs TQMVX

37% FI Score
  • tqmvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Value Equity Fund

Expenses: 0.72% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare IPAC vs ASUAX

37% FI Score
  • asuax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

AllianzGI Global Sustainability Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.09% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare IPAC vs FTCCX

37% FI Score
  • ftccx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Franklin Conservative Allocation Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.38% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare IPAC vs PRRFX

37% FI Score
  • prrfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Putnam RetirementReady 2055 Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.42% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo