Expense Ratio Rating
5 /10
Expense Rating
1 /10
Market Score
4 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
4 /10
$INGBX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 1,315 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- emkcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Ashmore Emerging Markets Total Return Fund C Class
Expenses: 2.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- tflix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Transamerica Floating Rate Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- iixix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Catalyst Insider Income Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- vslax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Invesco Senior Loan Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.94% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- wfhyx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Wells Fargo Short-Term High Yield Bond Fund - Class C
Expenses: 1.56% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- pgybx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Pioneer Global Multisector Income Fund Class Y
Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- ahycx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Invesco High Yield Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.76% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- kccb
- ETF
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
KraneShares CCBS China Corporate High Yield Bond USD Index ETF
Expenses: 0.69% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- hfhax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Hartford Floating Rate High Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »