Expense Ratio Rating
10 /10
Expense Rating
9 /10
Market Score
2 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
2 /10
$IIGV Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 1,315 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- ig
- ETF
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Principal Investment Grade Corporate Active ETF
Expenses: 0.26% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- fpfix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
FPA Flexible Fixed Income Fund
Expenses: 0.39% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- jasbx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Janus Henderson Short-Term Bond Fund Class T
Expenses: 0.71% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- mwhix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Metropolitan West High Yield Bond Fund Class Institutional
Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- bhyax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
BlackRock High Yield Bond Portfolio Investor A Shares
Expenses: 0.92% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- itaax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Transamerica Short-Term Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.82% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- dtrix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Delaware Limited-Term Diversified Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.54% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- ostix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Osterweis Strategic Income Fund
Expenses: 0.84% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- hygv
- ETF
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
FlexShares High Yield Value-Scored Bond Index Fund
Expenses: 0.37% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »