• gilfx
• Mutual Fund
• Bond
• High Yield Bond

Guggenheim Limited Duration Fund C-Class

Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

• labax
• Mutual Fund
• Bond
• High Yield Bond

Loomis Sayles Strategic Alpha Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

• hyls
• ETF
• Bond
• High Yield Bond

First Trust Tactical High Yield ETF

Expenses: 1.23% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

• pbtrx
• Mutual Fund
• Bond
• High Yield Bond

PGIM Global Total Return Fund - Class B

Expenses: 1.63% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

• acp
• Mutual Fund
• Bond
• High Yield Bond

Aberdeen Income Credit Strategies Fund

Expenses: 3.89% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

• hfro
• Mutual Fund
• Bond
• High Yield Bond

Highland Income Fund

Expenses: 3.39% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

• hwdcx
• Mutual Fund
• Bond
• High Yield Bond

The Hartford World Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

• plhix
• Mutual Fund
• Bond
• High Yield Bond

Pacific Funds High Income Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

• ggm
• Mutual Fund
• Bond
• High Yield Bond

Guggenheim Credit Allocation Fund

Expenses: 2.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

• bwg
• Mutual Fund
• Bond
• High Yield Bond

BrandywineGLOBAL – Global Income Opportunities Fund

Expenses: 3.11% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

• ardc
• Mutual Fund
• Bond
• High Yield Bond

Ares Dynamic Credit Allocation Fund, Inc.

Expenses: 3.43% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

• tgmbx
• Mutual Fund
• Bond
• High Yield Bond

PGIM Corporate Bond Fund- Class Z

Expenses: 0.55% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

• fam
• Mutual Fund
• Bond
• High Yield Bond

First Trust/Aberdeen Global Opportunity Income Fund

Expenses: 2.88% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

• itacx
• Mutual Fund
• Bond
• High Yield Bond

Transamerica Short-Term Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.61% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

• pyewx
• Mutual Fund
• Bond
• High Yield Bond

Payden Emerging Markets Bond Fund Advisor Class

Expenses: 0.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

• ecibx
• Mutual Fund
• Bond
• High Yield Bond

Eaton Vance Income Fund of Boston Class C

Expenses: 1.79% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

• jsd
• Mutual Fund
• Bond
• High Yield Bond

Nuveen Short Duration Credit Opportunity Fund

Expenses: 3.45% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

• tldix
• Mutual Fund
• Bond
• High Yield Bond

Thornburg Low Duration Income Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

• medcx
• Mutual Fund
• Bond
• High Yield Bond

MFS Emerging Markets Debt Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.81% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

• mdhax
• Mutual Fund
• Bond
• High Yield Bond

MainStay MacKay Short Duration High Yield Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.04% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »