Diversification Rating
1 /10
Expense Ratio Rating
4 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
4 /10
Category Score
10 /10
Market Size
4 /10
$IFV Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 9,369 International Stocks Large Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- svscx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
State Street Dynamic Small Cap Fund Class N
Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- ssefx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Blend
AMG SouthernSun U.S. Equity Fund Class N
Expenses: 1.19% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- rfxax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Total US Bond Market
Rational Special Situations Income Fund Class A Shares
Expenses: 2.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »
- wbii
- ETF
- Bond
- Total US Bond Market
WBI BullBear Global Income ETF
Expenses: 1.29% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »
- ryjcx
- Mutual Fund
- Alternative
- Inverse
Rydex Inverse Government Long Bond Strategy Fund Class C
Expenses: 5.13% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »
- rgsax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
AllianzGI Global Small-Cap Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.62% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- rifyx
- Mutual Fund
- Sector Equity
- Technology
Victory RS Science and Technology Fund Class Y
Expenses: 1.24% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »
- rsfcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Victory Floating Rate Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- ryaqx
- Mutual Fund
- Alternative
- Inverse
Rydex Inverse Government Long Bond Strategy Fund Class A
Expenses: 4.37% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »