Expense Ratio Rating
2 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
6 /10
Category Score
10 /10
Market Size
6 /10
$IFLLX Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 8,623 Bond Total US Bond Market funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- hrsvx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Heartland Select Value Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- fpcgx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
Fort Pitt Capital Total Return Fund
Expenses: 1.24% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- hwacx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Hotchkis & Wiley Value Opportunities Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.96% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- frrsx
- Mutual Fund
- Alternatives
- Real Estate
Franklin Real Estate Securities Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.76% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »
- lbgax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Growth
ClearBridge Mid Cap Growth Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.12% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- limax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Lateef Focused Sustainable Growth Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- pinox
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Large Growth
Putnam International Growth Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »
- raylx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Conductor Global Equity Value Fund Class Y
Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- sbtcx
- Mutual Fund
- Alternatives
- Short
Salient Tactical Plus Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »