Expense Ratio Rating
7 /10
Expense Rating
4 /10
Market Score
10 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
10 /10
$IFAFX Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 9,682 Allocation All-In-One funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- vnla
- ETF
- Alternative
- Short
Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF
Expenses: 0.26% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Short Alternative fund. See why »
- tfcax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
SEI Institutional Managed Trust Tax-Free Conservative Income Fund Class F
Expenses: 0.30% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- fapcx
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Large Growth
Fidelity® International Capital Appreciation K6 Fund
Expenses: 0.63% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »
- fflqx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Franklin Federal Limited-Term Tax-Free Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.64% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- fleh
- ETF
- International Stocks
- Europe Stock
Franklin FTSE Europe Hedged ETF
Expenses: 0.09% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Europe Stock International Stocks fund. See why »
- fmihx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
FMI Large Cap Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 0.82% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- fmijx
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Large Blend
FMI International Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »
- fndb
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF
Expenses: 0.25% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- foccx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
AIG Focused Growth Fund Class C
Expenses: 0.52% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- flvcx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Blend
Fidelity® Leveraged Company Stock Fund
Expenses: 0.78% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- gtlix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Core Equity Portfolio Institutional Shares
Expenses: 0.66% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- hewj
- ETF
- International Stocks
- Japan Stock
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Japan ETF
Expenses: 0.49% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »
- jmom
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF
Expenses: 0.12% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- hfqtx
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Large Value
Janus Henderson Global Equity Income Fund Class T
Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »
- nwffx
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Emerging Markets
American Funds New World Fund® Class F-1
Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »
- nyvtx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
Davis New York Venture Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.89% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- oakix
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Large Blend
Oakmark International Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 0.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »
- jsosx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
JPMorgan Strategic Income Opportunities Fund Class I Shares
Expenses: 0.73% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »