Expense Ratio Rating
9 /10
Expense Rating
6 /10
Market Score
2 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
2 /10
We found 633 Allocation Total World funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
MFS Global Equity Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.91% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Hartford Global Real Asset Fund Class R5
Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Wilmington Real Asset Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.96% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
MFS Global Total Return Fund Class B
Expenses: 1.84% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
MFS Global Total Return Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.84% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Principal Diversified Real Asset Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Janus Henderson Dividend & Income Builder Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.92% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Victory RS Global Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Goldman Sachs Dynamic Global Equity Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.33% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Aberdeen Dynamic Allocation Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.58% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.
Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!
Join & Get Your First Course Free© 2024 Adam Fortuna
Site Map