• fstix
• Mutual Fund
• Bond
• High Yield Bond

Federated Short-Term Income Fund Service Shares

Expenses: 0.57% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

• mmtm
• ETF
• US Stocks
• Large Blend

SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF

Expenses: 0.12% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

• lsdix
• Mutual Fund
• Bond
• Total US Bond Market

Loomis Sayles Intermediate Duration Bond Fund Y Class

Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

• cfo
• ETF
• US Stocks
• Large Blend

VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF

Expenses: 0.35% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

• xtn
• ETF
• Sector Equity
• Industrials

SPDR S&P Transportation ETF

Expenses: 0.35% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Industrials Sector Equity fund. See why »

• upro
• ETF
• Alternative
• Leveraged Equities

ProShares UltraPro S&P500

Expenses: 0.92% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

• nfra
• ETF
• Allocation
• Global Equity

FlexShares STOXX Global Broad Infrastructure Index Fund

Expenses: 0.47% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Global Equity Allocation fund. See why »

• swbgx
• Mutual Fund
• Allocation
• All-In-One

Schwab MarketTrack Balanced Portfolio™

Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

• fflqx
• Mutual Fund
• Bond
• Municipal Bond

Franklin Federal Limited-Term Tax-Free Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.64% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

• fpkfx
• Mutual Fund
• Allocation
• All-In-One

Fidelity® Puritan K6 Fund

Expenses: 0.31% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

• swanx
• Mutual Fund
• US Stocks
• Large Blend

Schwab Core Equity Fund™

Expenses: 0.73% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

• fffdx
• Mutual Fund
• Allocation
• Target-Date

Fidelity Freedom® 2020 Fund

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

• bscr
• ETF
• Bond
• High Yield Bond

Invesco BulletShares 2027 Corporate Bond ETF

Expenses: 0.10% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

• pfnix
• Mutual Fund
• Bond
• High Yield Bond

PIMCO Low Duration Income Fund I-3

Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

• spxu
• ETF
• Alternative
• Inverse

ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500

Expenses: 0.91% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

• hsdyx
• Mutual Fund
• Bond
• High Yield Bond

Hartford Short Duration Fund Class Y

Expenses: 0.52% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

• cmvix
• Mutual Fund
• US Stocks
• Large Growth

BlackRock Advantage Large Cap Growth Fund Institutional Shares

Expenses: 0.62% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

• ahtfx
• Mutual Fund
• Bond
• High Yield Bond

American Funds American High-Income Trust® Class F-1

Expenses: 0.74% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

• pemgx
• Mutual Fund
• US Stocks
• Mid-Cap Growth

Principal MidCap Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.98% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

• shyd
• ETF
• Bond
• Municipal Bond

VanEck Vectors Short High-Yield Municipal Index ETF

Expenses: 0.35% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »