Expense Ratio Rating
8 /10
Expense Rating
5 /10
Market Score
3 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
3 /10
$IBND Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 1,315 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- ifrax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Voya Floating Rate Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- plcsx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Pacific Funds Short Duration Income Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- pxhax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Pax High Yield Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.96% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- nshax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Neuberger Berman Short Duration Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.76% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- pplcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
DWS Short Duration Fund - Class C
Expenses: 1.54% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- dhhax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Diamond Hill High Yield Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- pelnx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
PIMCO Emerging Markets Local Currency and Bond Fund Class I-3
Expenses: 1.85% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- dgccx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Delaware Corporate Bond Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.57% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- souax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
American Beacon Sound Point Floating Rate Income Fund A Class
Expenses: 1.13% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »