Expense Ratio Rating
8 /10
Expense Rating
5 /10
Market Score
3 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
3 /10
$IBND Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 1,315 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- jucix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Janus Henderson Absolute Return Income Opportunities Fund - I Shares
Expenses: 0.74% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- fhyax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Federated High Yield Trust Class A
Expenses: 0.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- cdicx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Calvert Short Duration Income Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.55% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- afrcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Invesco Floating Rate Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.58% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- kcny
- ETF
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
KraneShares E Fund China Commercial Paper ETF
Expenses: 0.59% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- chicx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Credit Suisse Floating Rate High Income Fund C
Expenses: 1.70% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- nehyx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Loomis Sayles High Income Fund Class Y
Expenses: 0.77% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- ashcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
AllianzGI Short Duration High Income Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.14% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- rfrax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Columbia Floating Rate Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »