Expense Ratio Rating
10 /10
Expense Rating
9 /10
Market Score
6 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
6 /10
$IBDP Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 1,315 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- flia
- ETF
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Franklin Liberty International Aggregate Bond ETF
Expenses: 0.25% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- sbsyx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Western Asset Short-Term Bond Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- gobix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
BrandywineGLOBAL - Global Opportunities Bond Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.68% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- hwdix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
The Hartford World Bond Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.74% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- ppilx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
DWS Short Duration Fund - Class Inst
Expenses: 0.54% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- stbax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Invesco Short Term Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.65% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- pbsmx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
PGIM Short-Term Corporate Bond Fund- Class A
Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- phb
- ETF
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Invesco Fundamental High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- styix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Wells Fargo Short-Term High Yield Bond Fund - Class Inst
Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »