Expense Ratio Rating
8 /10
Expense Rating
4 /10
Market Score
7 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
7 /10
$HYS Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 1,315 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- fehax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
First Eagle High Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.24% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- irbax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Ivy Pictet Targeted Return Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- ofinx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Invesco Intermediate Bond Factor Fund Class R
Expenses: 1.13% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- dpfnx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Deer Park Total Return Credit Fund Class I
Expenses: 2.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- psfrx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Virtus Newfleet Senior Floating Rate Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- anhax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Angel Oak High Yield Opportunities Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- emdzx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
PGIM Emerging Markets Debt Local Currency Fund-Class Z
Expenses: 0.88% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- rsfcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Victory Floating Rate Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- sasfx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
AIG Senior Floating Rate Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »